Court Rules To Protect “Human Rights”, Denying Officials From Deporting Jihadi

Court Rules To Protect “Human Rights”, Denying Officials From Deporting Jihadi
A spokeswoman determined that the ruling is meant to assure the case follows the proper steps in a deportation proceeding and that it is not a final verdict in the case.

A spokeswoman determined that the ruling is meant to assure the case follows the proper steps in a deportation proceeding and that it is not a final verdict in the case.


In what could be categorized as one of the most controversial decisions in its history, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) blocked Germany’s deportation of an 18-year-old Russian man who was considered to be a really “dangerous” jihadi in a last minute ruling.


According to German media outlets, the man was on his way to the airport in the city of Frankfurt when suddenly the ECHR interfered in the process of deportation. Apparently, a spokeswoman determined that the ruling is meant to assure the case follows the proper steps in a deportation proceeding and that it is not a final verdict in the case.


What makes this situation so controversial is the fact that less than a week ago the highest court of Germany determined that foreigners suspected of posing a terror threat can be deported under the nation’s constitution.


Germany's Christmas Marred by Another Senseless Attack Perpetrated By A Jihadi.

Germany’s Christmas Marred by Another Senseless Attack Perpetrated By A Jihadi.


Recently, the country’s Federal Constitutional Court ruled that the expulsion of an Algerian man who was considered to be a “dangerous” individual by state ministers was not unlawful. As a matter of fact, interior ministers in the state of Bremen ordered for him to be deported after concluding he was potentially planning a terrorist attack.


Reports revealed that the Algerian man not only challenged the decision, but also the law that allows every state to expel foreigners in order to defend against anything that represents a particular danger for the security of the country, or against a terrorist risk. This law was introduced after the terrorist attack on September 11 in the United States, but wasn’t used until the Berlin Christmas market attack back in December.


This gruesome act was perpetrated by Anis Amri, a Tunisian asylum-seeker who expressed his loyalty to the Islamic State before killing dozens of people with a truck. Controversy emerged after it was known that German police had information about Amri’s intentions of committing a suicide attack and do nothing to stop it.


Experts believe this case could become a tipping point in Germany´s migrant crisis considering that Chancellor Angela Merkel has refused to take efficient measures to solve this concerning issue.

Experts believe this case could become a tipping point in Germany´s migrant crisis considering that Chancellor Angela Merkel has refused to take efficient measures to solve this concerning issue.


Back in march, authorities warned in a confidential memo to regional authorities in the first months of 2016 that it had intercepted communications indicating that the Tunisian should be deported since he was planning a suicide attack. However, the state government of North-Rhine-Westphalia ruled that an order to expel Amri from the country was not legally enforceable.


Recently, German authorities have further used the law to deport two German-born individuals who police accused of planning a terrorist attack, after it was known that the suspects had weapons and Islamic State flags in their apartment. Both men were subsequently ordered to be deported to their parent’s home countries of Nigeria and Algeria.


After the ruling in March, Lower Saxony’s Interior Minister Boris Pistorius said that German authorities are sending a clear warning to every single fanatic in the country that they will not give them a single inch of space to carry out their despicable plans. Additionally Pistorius told they will face the full force of the law, no matter if they were born in Germany or any other country.


Scenes like this have become common in many places of Germany like Frankfurt or Berlin.

Scenes like this have become common in many places of Germany like Frankfurt or Berlin.


Since the beginning of the open borders’ policy, Islamic extremism has been one of the greatest threats to German society. According to a new report by the Heritage Foundation think tank, more than half –which represents 54 percent- of terror plots in the country have involved refugees and asylum seekers since 2014 and the onset of the migrant crisis.


The report found that attacks across the continent by foreign trained militants widely increased last year, following the height of the migrant influx, with Germany becoming a much more popular target for jihadis.



Regarding this issue, the report’s author wrote that the increase in the threat to Germany is incredibly stark. Additionally, the author stated that while there were no plots in the country in 2014 and only two in 2015, this situation increased eightfold in 2016


Far from not pointing out the reason, the author revealed that the main factor behind this issue was that Germany took in over 1 million refugees in 2015 and last year saw a surge in plots involving refugees.


Plots in the country comprised just 5 percent of those in Europe back in 2015, shooting up to 27 percent in 2016. As a matter of fact, Germany faced more plots in 2016 alone than in the decade and half between 2000 and 2015, being the most common targets civilians rather than the government.



The post Court Rules To Protect “Human Rights”, Denying Officials From Deporting Jihadi appeared first on Conservative Daily Post.


Source -> http://last-cabin.xfer.tk/2017/08/court-rules-to-protect-human-rights-denying-officials-from-deporting-jihadi/

Comments